Advertisement
reality math can be as slippery as a skinned peach in summer. you have to get the feel for it. lick the juice from its nectarous body and taste it's essence. but once you do, it starts to talk to you. it will tell you things that will stump the old school mathematicians, but i have yet to get a denial of its veracity even from my wizened old mathematical friend michael (berkeley math doctor worked on infinitesimals...numbers infinitely close to zero, yet still not zero...now that i think of it he and i are really close in some funny ways...he is also from the same l.a. suburban town of arcadia as i am, went to the same schools from high school to college...etc...he took a hawaiian vacation in 76 when switching professorial seats from berkeley to harvard and has been here since). blah blah blah...the point is...reality math is a snake and it is gonna bite your ass and you will know it! it will start to work behind your eyes factoring the reality quotients of experience and making you laugh with precision...that kind of thing...so let's go!
fundamental precept:
-> 0>1
this is the basic equation which can always be used for the roughest granularity of reality factoring. don't think of it symbolically as if it is just supposed to work out like 2+2=4. examine the meaning behind the symbols which are 0 and 1 and >. you almost have to let go of any idea of how math works and make the numbers represent reality as directly as you can. ie: there can be no such thing as 0 apples. it just doesn't happen, so don't let your mind go that way...that is the way that old math gets confused. they allow fantasy into their equations and that drives out reality.
ok...working backwards (as my mind is so bent on doing) it seems that
the initial preprecept is 0 itself...i'll call it the zero precept: -> 0
ok?...you have to understand that for there to be 0 it has to be real. no 0 papayas! no no no! it never happens. 0 is something else completely.
don't let the mind drift into symbology!
don't let 0 mean something else!
there is only one 0 (and it includes 1 by the way).
you don't have to identify an object which is this 0, in fact that will be what stops you from understanding reality math.
so, try to find 0 with your mind that understands nothing! (it is useful to keep your sense of humor in this field).
i will borrow an ideal from the religion that i started (bumperstickerism...please join that tribe too if you wish) to help with this concept:
->Be Homer!
i better start another philosophical sect: homerism which is the acceptance of complete idiocy as a way of knowledge (this one is an acquired taste...a bit dodgy around the edges).
by being homer you can disable your thinking minds ability to create significance, constantly ascribing meaning to objects other than what they mean by themselves. in other words...you have to find out what 0 is in reality.
when you do that you will understand:
->0>1
->0=infinity (not ~= (equivalent) but 0 "is" infinity. before 1. no separations.
well i think that is enough to start
anybody feel it?
zero loves you
fundamental precept:
-> 0>1
this is the basic equation which can always be used for the roughest granularity of reality factoring. don't think of it symbolically as if it is just supposed to work out like 2+2=4. examine the meaning behind the symbols which are 0 and 1 and >. you almost have to let go of any idea of how math works and make the numbers represent reality as directly as you can. ie: there can be no such thing as 0 apples. it just doesn't happen, so don't let your mind go that way...that is the way that old math gets confused. they allow fantasy into their equations and that drives out reality.
ok...working backwards (as my mind is so bent on doing) it seems that
the initial preprecept is 0 itself...i'll call it the zero precept: -> 0
ok?...you have to understand that for there to be 0 it has to be real. no 0 papayas! no no no! it never happens. 0 is something else completely.
don't let the mind drift into symbology!
don't let 0 mean something else!
there is only one 0 (and it includes 1 by the way).
you don't have to identify an object which is this 0, in fact that will be what stops you from understanding reality math.
so, try to find 0 with your mind that understands nothing! (it is useful to keep your sense of humor in this field).
i will borrow an ideal from the religion that i started (bumperstickerism...please join that tribe too if you wish) to help with this concept:
->Be Homer!
i better start another philosophical sect: homerism which is the acceptance of complete idiocy as a way of knowledge (this one is an acquired taste...a bit dodgy around the edges).
by being homer you can disable your thinking minds ability to create significance, constantly ascribing meaning to objects other than what they mean by themselves. in other words...you have to find out what 0 is in reality.
when you do that you will understand:
->0>1
->0=infinity (not ~= (equivalent) but 0 "is" infinity. before 1. no separations.
well i think that is enough to start
anybody feel it?
zero loves you
posted by:
|
Hawaii
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: reality math
Thu, October 23, 2003 - 12:28 PMUm...yeah, I *think* I feel it. Not sure I understand it, but I feel it....
Did Zero die for my sins? -
-
Re: reality math
Thu, October 23, 2003 - 1:29 PMi don't think so...dying and sins don't really make sense in relation to zero.
here's how i'd use reality math to factor it though:
dying requires separation...something (an individual unit of zero...which is then no longer zero, but 1...thus separated) became not zero which means it is not zero and therefore zero cannot die because dying requires non zero ness.
sin is the same thing: sin requires separation. zero separates nothing into nothing. there is no sin in zero because zero unseparates it from it's relative position. zero dissolves sin into the yummy nectar of every/nothingness.
that makes me think of another reality math precept:
->X/0=0
the motto: always divide by zero
it isn't an error if you look at it in the zeroistic way. since infinity and zero are the same thing (they sort of wrap around to be eachother) division is separating something into a number of individual units...dividing by zero separates something into zero individual units which is effectively removing all separations.
maybe there should be a zero calculator! -
-
Re: reality math
Thu, October 23, 2003 - 3:34 PMGotcha! I was joking, of course, about the dying-for-my-sins thing, but your response puts things in a very interesting new perspective.
;) -
-
Re: reality math
Sat, October 25, 2003 - 3:35 PMso what's the difference between zero and the whole universe(s) given that they both essentially have the appearance of infinity. would 'om' be a representation of zero? -
-
Re: reality math
Mon, June 14, 2004 - 5:03 AMoh, yeah, i think for sure om would be a representation of zero. the weird thing about zero is that it has no differences, so there can't be a difference between it and the whole universe. so i think that those things must be sort of the same too (except i don't know about the "scientists" coming up with other universes thingy...that just seems far out...except i'd probably go for other dimensions, but they would still be part of this universe and then still part of zero...actually zero is a bit scary that way, cause it is really hard to find something that isn't a part of it)(i'm kinda playing it by ear hear with this science bit).
-
-
-
-
-
Re: reality math
Mon, May 3, 2004 - 2:40 PM
I want to make apple pie, but I have zero apples. Yes, zero. Means I need to go to the store and buy >0 apples. Except I go to the store and realize that I have bounced a check and now have -26.95 dollars. Therefore I still have zero apples, because I have less than zero money. 27.00 later, I have fifty cents and a rather nasty-tasting apple.
Now THAT'S reality math.
